#### Table of Contents

#### Introduction

I came across a question on DSP Stack Exchange the other day: can the Fourier Transform magnitude be negative? This is a great question! The answer is no, and let’s take a look at why.

More blogs on DSP:

#### Discrete Time Fourier Transform

The discrete-time Fourier transform (DTFT) is

(1)

The DTFT is a cross correlation of x[n] with a complex exponential . The summation over all n produces a single complex number. The DTFT is written as a real and imaginary component,

(2)

where

(3)

and

(4)

#### Magnitude of Complex Number

Rather than use the complex number in (2) a simpler representation is given by

(5)

where the complex number c has a real part a and an imaginary part jb. The magnitude of a complex number c can be written as

(6)

The magnitude can be written in terms of a and b by substituting (5) into (6),

(7)

The square of a real number and cannot be negative and the square root of a positive number is always positive, therefore the magnitude cannot be negative.

#### Plotting Magnitude of Complex Number

Conceptually the magnitude of a complex number c is the length of the vector beginning at the origin 0 + 0j and ending at c. Consider a complex number

(8)

Figure 1 plots the complex vector c in 2D complex space.

The magnitude is the distance from 0+0j to -3-7j which is

(9)

#### Fourier Transform Magnitude

Using the representation in (2) for the complex number the magnitude can be written as

(10)

which is always a positive number.

#### Takeaway

The magnitude of a complex number always has to be positive by definition, it can never be negative. The magnitude is conceptually the length of a complex vector which is written mathematically as .

More blogs on DSP:

Got a question? Drop it in the comments below or send me an email: matt@wavewalkerdsp.com

## One Response

I definitely agree that the magnitude of the Fourier transform, or any complex number, is non-negative. But students or newcomers to DSP might be a bit confused about this statement: “the square root of a positive number is always positive.” Because square roots of positive numbers can be negative: -2 is a valid square root of 4. I think the difference is in the definition of “magnitude” (or “modulus” or “absolute value”) which is defined as the positive square root.

When we use the square-root symbol, and there is no ‘-‘ or ‘+’ in front of it, ‘+’ is assumed.

Interested readers might look into metric spaces and inner products:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnitude_(mathematics)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_space#Euclidean_norm